Comparing efficiencies of polypropylene treatment by atmospheric pressure plasma jets

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPolášková, Kateřinacs
dc.contributor.authorOzkan, Alpcs
dc.contributor.authorKlíma, Milošcs
dc.contributor.authorJeníková, Zdeňkacs
dc.contributor.authorBuddhadasa, Madhuwanthics
dc.contributor.authorReniers, Françoiscs
dc.contributor.authorZajíčková, Lenkacs
dc.coverage.issue11cs
dc.coverage.volume20cs
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-16T10:42:50Z
dc.date.available2024-02-16T10:42:50Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-11cs
dc.description.abstractPlasma treatment of polypropylene (PP) is a well-established method of improving its surface properties. However, the efficiencies of different plasma discharges are seldom compared. Herein, we discuss the differences in PP treated by three arc-based commercial plasma jets working in dry air, Plasmatreat rotating plasma jet (PT-RPJ), AFS PlasmaJet & REG; (AFS-PJ), and SurfaceTreat gliding arc jet (ST-GA), and by the low-temperature RF plasma slit jet (RF-PSJ) working in argon. The AFS-PJ has a significantly different reactive species composition dominated by nitrogen oxides. It induced higher thermal loads leading to surface damage. The other arc-based jets (PT-RPJ and ST-GA) created the PP surface with higher oxygen and nitrogen concentration than the low-temperature RF-PSJ. It induced a higher adhesion strength measured on PP-aluminum joints.en
dc.formattextcs
dc.format.extent1-18cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfcs
dc.identifier.citationPlasma Processes and Polymers. 2023, vol. 20, issue 11, p. 1-18.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ppap.202300031cs
dc.identifier.issn1612-8850cs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2687-9274cs
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0004-5890-2493cs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6906-8906cs
dc.identifier.other184209cs
dc.identifier.researcheridJXN-4299-2024cs
dc.identifier.researcheridE-3010-2012cs
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11012/244997
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherWILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBHcs
dc.relation.ispartofPlasma Processes and Polymerscs
dc.relation.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ppap.202300031cs
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalcs
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.rights.sherpahttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1612-8850/cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/cs
dc.subjectadhesionen
dc.subjectarc-based jeten
dc.subjectlow-temperature plasma jeten
dc.subjectplasma treatmenten
dc.subjectpoly(propylene) (PP)en
dc.titleComparing efficiencies of polypropylene treatment by atmospheric pressure plasma jetsen
dc.type.driverarticleen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
sync.item.dbidVAV-184209en
sync.item.dbtypeVAVen
sync.item.insts2024.02.16 11:42:50en
sync.item.modts2024.02.16 11:13:01en
thesis.grantorVysoké učení technické v Brně. Středoevropský technologický institut VUT. Plazmové technologie pro materiálycs
thesis.grantorVysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta elektrotechniky a komunikačních technologií. Ústav teoretické a experimentální elektrotechnikycs
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Plasma Processes Polymers 2023 Polaskova Comparing efficiencies of polypropylene treatment by atmospheric pressure.pdf
Size:
2.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
file Plasma Processes Polymers 2023 Polaskova Comparing efficiencies of polypropylene treatment by atmospheric pressure.pdf
Download
Collections
Ústav teoretické a experimentální elektrotechniky
Plazmové technologie pro materiály