Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Viticultural Production in Central European Conditions

dc.contributor.authorBača, Petrcs
dc.contributor.authorMašán, Vladimírcs
dc.contributor.authorVanýsek, Petrcs
dc.contributor.authorBurg, Patrikcs
dc.contributor.authorBinar, Tomášcs
dc.contributor.authorBurgová, Janacs
dc.contributor.authorAbrham, Zdeněkcs
dc.coverage.issue15cs
dc.coverage.volume16cs
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-18T11:36:11Z
dc.date.available2025-02-18T11:36:11Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-31cs
dc.description.abstractA number of factors will increasingly play a role in the sustainability of wine production in the coming period. The current situation suggests that the analysis of energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will play a particularly important role. The so-called carbon footprint, expressed in CO2 equivalents, is used to express the sum of GHG emissions. This study presents an analysis of vine cultivation in a particular Central European region, with the main focus on quantifying the inputs, yield, fuel consumption, and GHG emissions. The emphasis was placed on conventional, integrated, and ecological production systems of growing, evaluated with the help of the developed AGROTEKIS version 5 software. A total of 30 wine-grower entities in the Morava wine-growing region, the subregion Velk & eacute; Pavlovice, in the Czech Republic weather climate, were included in the input data survey. By analyzing the aggregated values, the real savings in energy and curbing of CO2 emissions of vineyards could be observed, relating to individual work procedures with lower energy demand used in the vineyard treatment as well as the amounts and doses of agrochemicals used. The average values of the total impacts did not show any statistically significant differences between the conventional (971 +/- 78 kg CO2eq<middle dot>ha-1<middle dot>year-1) and integrated production systems (930 +/- 62 kg CO2eq<middle dot>ha-1<middle dot>year-1), whereas the values for the ecological production system were significantly higher (1479 +/- 40 kg CO2eq<middle dot>ha-1<middle dot>year-1). The results show that growing vines under ecological production conditions generates a higher proportion of the carbon footprint than under conventional production conditions. Overall, the best results can be achieved in an integrated production system.en
dc.formattextcs
dc.format.extent1-15cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfcs
dc.identifier.citationSustainability. 2024, vol. 16, issue 15, p. 1-15.en
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su16156561cs
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050cs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9793-9767cs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5458-393Xcs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4426-2857cs
dc.identifier.other189339cs
dc.identifier.researcheridH-7547-2018cs
dc.identifier.researcheridA-1949-2016cs
dc.identifier.scopus7004123643cs
dc.identifier.scopus7004078600cs
dc.identifier.scopus54079251600cs
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11012/250051
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherMDPIcs
dc.relation.ispartofSustainabilitycs
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6561cs
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalcs
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.rights.sherpahttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/2071-1050/cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectgreenhouse gas emissionsen
dc.subjectfuel consumptionen
dc.subjectmaterialsen
dc.subjectprocessen
dc.subjectconventionalen
dc.subjectintegrateden
dc.subjectecological productionen
dc.subjectVelk & eacuteen
dc.subjectPavloviceen
dc.titleAssessing the Carbon Footprint of Viticultural Production in Central European Conditionsen
dc.type.driverarticleen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
sync.item.dbidVAV-189339en
sync.item.dbtypeVAVen
sync.item.insts2025.02.18 12:36:11en
sync.item.modts2025.02.13 14:31:57en
thesis.grantorVysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta elektrotechniky a komunikačních technologií. Ústav elektrotechnologiecs
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
sustainability1606561v2.pdf
Size:
910.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
file sustainability1606561v2.pdf