Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Viticultural Production in Central European Conditions

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Bača, Petr
Mašán, Vladimír
Vanýsek, Petr
Burg, Patrik
Binar, Tomáš
Burgová, Jana
Abrham, Zdeněk

Advisor

Referee

Mark

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

MDPI
Altmetrics

Abstract

A number of factors will increasingly play a role in the sustainability of wine production in the coming period. The current situation suggests that the analysis of energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will play a particularly important role. The so-called carbon footprint, expressed in CO2 equivalents, is used to express the sum of GHG emissions. This study presents an analysis of vine cultivation in a particular Central European region, with the main focus on quantifying the inputs, yield, fuel consumption, and GHG emissions. The emphasis was placed on conventional, integrated, and ecological production systems of growing, evaluated with the help of the developed AGROTEKIS version 5 software. A total of 30 wine-grower entities in the Morava wine-growing region, the subregion Velk & eacute; Pavlovice, in the Czech Republic weather climate, were included in the input data survey. By analyzing the aggregated values, the real savings in energy and curbing of CO2 emissions of vineyards could be observed, relating to individual work procedures with lower energy demand used in the vineyard treatment as well as the amounts and doses of agrochemicals used. The average values of the total impacts did not show any statistically significant differences between the conventional (971 +/- 78 kg CO2eq<middle dot>ha-1<middle dot>year-1) and integrated production systems (930 +/- 62 kg CO2eq<middle dot>ha-1<middle dot>year-1), whereas the values for the ecological production system were significantly higher (1479 +/- 40 kg CO2eq<middle dot>ha-1<middle dot>year-1). The results show that growing vines under ecological production conditions generates a higher proportion of the carbon footprint than under conventional production conditions. Overall, the best results can be achieved in an integrated production system.
A number of factors will increasingly play a role in the sustainability of wine production in the coming period. The current situation suggests that the analysis of energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will play a particularly important role. The so-called carbon footprint, expressed in CO2 equivalents, is used to express the sum of GHG emissions. This study presents an analysis of vine cultivation in a particular Central European region, with the main focus on quantifying the inputs, yield, fuel consumption, and GHG emissions. The emphasis was placed on conventional, integrated, and ecological production systems of growing, evaluated with the help of the developed AGROTEKIS version 5 software. A total of 30 wine-grower entities in the Morava wine-growing region, the subregion Velk & eacute; Pavlovice, in the Czech Republic weather climate, were included in the input data survey. By analyzing the aggregated values, the real savings in energy and curbing of CO2 emissions of vineyards could be observed, relating to individual work procedures with lower energy demand used in the vineyard treatment as well as the amounts and doses of agrochemicals used. The average values of the total impacts did not show any statistically significant differences between the conventional (971 +/- 78 kg CO2eq<middle dot>ha-1<middle dot>year-1) and integrated production systems (930 +/- 62 kg CO2eq<middle dot>ha-1<middle dot>year-1), whereas the values for the ecological production system were significantly higher (1479 +/- 40 kg CO2eq<middle dot>ha-1<middle dot>year-1). The results show that growing vines under ecological production conditions generates a higher proportion of the carbon footprint than under conventional production conditions. Overall, the best results can be achieved in an integrated production system.

Description

Citation

Sustainability. 2024, vol. 16, issue 15, p. 1-15.
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6561

Document type

Peer-reviewed

Document version

Published version

Date of access to the full text

Language of document

en

Study field

Comittee

Date of acceptance

Defence

Result of defence

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Citace PRO