Impact of various oxidation processes used for removal of sulfamethoxazole on the quality of treated wastewater

dc.contributor.authorTulková, Terezacs
dc.contributor.authorFučík, Jancs
dc.contributor.authorKozáková, Zdenkacs
dc.contributor.authorProcházková, Petracs
dc.contributor.authorKrčma, Františekcs
dc.contributor.authorZlámalová Gargošová, Helenacs
dc.contributor.authorMravcová, Ludmilacs
dc.contributor.authorSovová, Kateřinacs
dc.coverage.issue3cs
dc.coverage.volume9cs
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-01T10:58:24Z
dc.date.available2023-08-01T10:58:24Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-17cs
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this research is to describe the impact of different advanced oxidation processes used for the removal of sulfamethoxazole on wastewater quality. Ozone, UV, a combination of ozone and UV, and plasma discharge were employed. Concentrations of sulfamethoxazole were analysed by LC-MS/MS. Chemical and microbiological analyses and ecotoxicological tests were conducted to investigate the quality of treated wastewater. The results of this study show that the most effective technique for the removal of sulfamethoxazole is O3, followed by plasma discharge, O3 + UV and, finally, UV. A significant effect of tested advanced oxidation processes on the chemical composition of wastewater was not observed; however, the number of microorganisms was reduced. In the case of ecotoxicological tests with Lemna minor and crustacean Daphnia magna, a significant negative effect was only observed when plasma was applied.en
dc.formattextcs
dc.format.extent1-11cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfcs
dc.identifier.citationEmerging Contaminants. 2023, vol. 9, issue 3, p. 1-11.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.emcon.2023.100231cs
dc.identifier.issn2405-6650cs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7780-0469cs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3408-4383cs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3877-6587cs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9139-6175cs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4418-3323cs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8309-8012cs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1011-6616cs
dc.identifier.other184065cs
dc.identifier.researcheridAAM-2014-2021cs
dc.identifier.researcheridG-9690-2018cs
dc.identifier.scopus35810645600cs
dc.identifier.scopus25621742800cs
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11012/213618
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.cs
dc.relation.ispartofEmerging Contaminantscs
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240566502300029Xcs
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalcs
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.rights.sherpahttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/2405-6650/cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/cs
dc.subjectEmerging pollutantsen
dc.subjectSulfamethoxazole degradationen
dc.subjectAdvanced oxidation processesen
dc.subjectOzonationen
dc.subjectNon-thermal plasmaen
dc.subjectUV treatmenten
dc.subjectWastewater treatmenten
dc.subjectLiquid chromatographyen
dc.subjectMass spectrometryen
dc.subjectSolid phase extractionen
dc.subjectWastewateren
dc.titleImpact of various oxidation processes used for removal of sulfamethoxazole on the quality of treated wastewateren
dc.type.driverarticleen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
sync.item.dbidVAV-184065en
sync.item.dbtypeVAVen
sync.item.insts2023.08.01 12:58:23en
sync.item.modts2023.08.01 12:19:58en
thesis.grantorVysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta chemická. Ústav chemie a technologie ochrany životního prostředícs
thesis.grantorVysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta chemická. Ústav fyzikální a spotřební chemiecs
thesis.grantorVysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta chemická. Centrum materiálového výzkumucs
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1s2.0S240566502300029Xmain.pdf
Size:
1.17 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
1s2.0S240566502300029Xmain.pdf