Performance and stability comparison of hydrostatic bearing pad geometry optimization approaches
dc.contributor.author | Michalec, Michal | cs |
dc.contributor.author | Foltýn, Jan | cs |
dc.contributor.author | Svoboda, Petr | cs |
dc.contributor.author | Křupka, Ivan | cs |
dc.contributor.author | Hartl, Martin | cs |
dc.coverage.issue | 4 | cs |
dc.coverage.volume | 89 | cs |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-26T12:56:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-05-26T12:56:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025-04-30 | cs |
dc.description.abstract | Hydrostatic bearings are commonly used across a range of applications, yet their reliance on externally pressurized lubricants presents significant energy consumption challenges. This research aims to experimentally assess various approaches for optimizing the geometry of hydrostatic bearing pads. Utilizing a two-pad hydrostatic tester equipped with online diagnostics, we analyzed optimized multi-recess pads developed through both analytical methods and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Our results demonstrate that the CFD method achieves a substantially greater film thickness recess pressure compared to the analytical method under similar experimental conditions. Additionally, the CFD approach reduces pumping power losses by 14%. However, this improvement in performance is accompanied by a reduction in film stiffness and an increased sensitivity to eccentric overload or misalignment, as highlighted in our findings. While the adoption of CFD-optimized geometries offers significant potential for lowering energy consumption, maintaining precise alignment especially in large-scale applications remains essential. In summary, our study suggests that employing CFD optimization can effectively reduce the service costs associated with hydrostatic bearings, but optimal outcomes necessitate careful alignment considerations. | en |
dc.format | text | cs |
dc.format.extent | 1-10 | cs |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | cs |
dc.identifier.citation | Forsch Ingenieurwes. 2025, vol. 89, issue 4, p. 1-10. | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10010-025-00837-8 | cs |
dc.identifier.issn | 1434-0860 | cs |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-8803-9043 | cs |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-6715-642X | cs |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-3091-4025 | cs |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-9936-7480 | cs |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-5432-6645 | cs |
dc.identifier.other | 197844 | cs |
dc.identifier.researcherid | AAM-3692-2020 | cs |
dc.identifier.researcherid | ABM-0959-2022 | cs |
dc.identifier.researcherid | F-5534-2012 | cs |
dc.identifier.researcherid | D-8147-2012 | cs |
dc.identifier.researcherid | D-8261-2012 | cs |
dc.identifier.scopus | 57205496270 | cs |
dc.identifier.scopus | 57277460500 | cs |
dc.identifier.scopus | 57188955459 | cs |
dc.identifier.scopus | 7005196946 | cs |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11012/251029 | |
dc.language.iso | en | cs |
dc.publisher | Springer Nature | cs |
dc.relation.ispartof | Forsch Ingenieurwes | cs |
dc.relation.uri | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10010-025-00837-8 | cs |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International | cs |
dc.rights.access | openAccess | cs |
dc.rights.sherpa | http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1434-0860/ | cs |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | cs |
dc.subject | Hydrostatic lubrication | en |
dc.subject | Bearing geometry | en |
dc.subject | Experimental testing | en |
dc.title | Performance and stability comparison of hydrostatic bearing pad geometry optimization approaches | en |
dc.type.driver | article | en |
dc.type.status | Peer-reviewed | en |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en |
sync.item.dbid | VAV-197844 | en |
sync.item.dbtype | VAV | en |
sync.item.insts | 2025.05.26 14:56:07 | en |
sync.item.modts | 2025.05.26 14:33:10 | en |
thesis.grantor | Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta strojního inženýrství. Ústav konstruování | cs |
thesis.grantor | Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta strojního inženýrství. ÚK-odbor tribologie | cs |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- s10010025008378.pdf
- Size:
- 1.67 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- file s10010025008378.pdf