Assessment of Soil Contamination with Potentially Toxic Elements and Soil Ecotoxicity of Botanical Garden in Brno, Czech Republic: Are Urban Botanical Gardens More Polluted Than Urban Parks?
Loading...
Date
2021-07-17
Authors
Pecina, Václav
Brtnický, Martin
Balková, Marie
Hegrová, Jitka
Bucková, Martina
Baltazár, Tivadar
Ličbinský, Roman
Radziemska, Maja
Advisor
Referee
Mark
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Abstract
Though botanical gardens are an important and widely visited component of urban green spaces (UGS) worldwide, their pollution is rarely studied. The aim of this study was to assess botanical garden soil contamination and ecotoxicity and to evaluate whether urban botanical gardens are more contaminated than urban parks. Soil assessments showed serious contamination with Cd, Pb and Zn, emitted predominantly by traffic, agrochemicals and past construction and demolition waste. The discovery of hazardous historical ecological burden in the UGS calls for the necessity of detailed surveys of such areas. Despite prevailing moderate-to-heavy contamination, the soil was only slightly ecotoxic. Maximum immobilisation inhibition of Daphnia magna reached 15%. Growth of Sinapis alba L. was predominantly stimulated (73%), and Desmodesmus subspicatus Chodat was exclusively stimulated, possibly due to soil alkalinity and fertiliser-related nutrients. The hypothesis of a higher contamination of urban botanical gardens compared to urban parks was confirmed. However, urban parks can face a greater risk of soil ecotoxicity, hypothetically due to decreased activity of soil organisms resulting from adverse soil conditions caused by active recreation. The results highlight the need for an increased focus on botanical and ornamental gardens when assessing and managing UGS as areas potentially more burdened with contamination.
Description
Citation
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021, vol. 18, issue 14, p. 1-13.
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7622
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7622
Document type
Peer-reviewed
Document version
Published version
Date of access to the full text
Language of document
en