Influence of the gripping fixture on the modified compact tension test results: evaluation of the experiments on cylindrical concrete specimens

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Holušová, Táňa
Lozano, Miguel
Canteli, Alfonso Fernández
Komárková, Tereza
Kocáb, Dalibor
Seitl, Stanislav

Advisor

Referee

Mark

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

VŠB-TUO
Altmetrics

Abstract

The modified compact tension test (MCT) might become in the future a stable test configuration for the evaluation of fracture-mechanics parameters or also for description of fatigue behavior of composites materials such as concrete. Core drilling is used for sampling of existing structures. These samples have cylindrical shape with the selected thickness to avoid the stress concentration. This contribution focuses on the evaluation of the fracture behavior during static and quasi static tests. Static tests are performed on standard specimen with diameter 150 mm and length 300 mm. The quasi-static tests are performed using two different gripping fixtures. The results for quasi-static tests are represented as L-COD diagrams (i.e. load vs. crack opening displacement) measured on the loading axis. The comparison of results and discussion of advantages and disadvantages are introduced.
The modified compact tension test (MCT) might become in the future a stable test configuration for the evaluation of fracture-mechanics parameters or also for description of fatigue behavior of composites materials such as concrete. Core drilling is used for sampling of existing structures. These samples have cylindrical shape with the selected thickness to avoid the stress concentration. This contribution focuses on the evaluation of the fracture behavior during static and quasi static tests. Static tests are performed on standard specimen with diameter 150 mm and length 300 mm. The quasi-static tests are performed using two different gripping fixtures. The results for quasi-static tests are represented as L-COD diagrams (i.e. load vs. crack opening displacement) measured on the loading axis. The comparison of results and discussion of advantages and disadvantages are introduced.

Description

Citation

Transactions of the VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Civil Engineering Series. 2015, vol. 15, issue 2, p. 1-11.
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/tvsb.2015.15.issue-2/tvsb-2015-0010/tvsb-2015-0010.xml?format=INT

Document type

Peer-reviewed

Document version

Published version

Date of access to the full text

Language of document

en

Study field

Comittee

Date of acceptance

Defence

Result of defence

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported
Citace PRO