Benchmarking State-of-the-art DIRECT-type Methods on the BBOB Noiseless Testbed
Loading...
Date
Authors
Kůdela, Jakub
Advisor
Referee
Mark
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
ORCID
Altmetrics
Abstract
In recent years, there has been significant progress in the development of new DIRECT-type algorithms for black-box optimization problems. In this paper, we evaluate three well-performing DIRECT-type methods from a recent extensive numerical study on the BBOB noiseless testbed in dimensions 2, 3, 5, 10, and 20. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these algorithms on different classes of functions and provide a comparison with the original DIRECT method, as well as with three other well-established methods: RL-SHADE, L-BFGS-B, and SLSQP.
In recent years, there has been significant progress in the development of new DIRECT-type algorithms for black-box optimization problems. In this paper, we evaluate three well-performing DIRECT-type methods from a recent extensive numerical study on the BBOB noiseless testbed in dimensions 2, 3, 5, 10, and 20. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these algorithms on different classes of functions and provide a comparison with the original DIRECT method, as well as with three other well-established methods: RL-SHADE, L-BFGS-B, and SLSQP.
In recent years, there has been significant progress in the development of new DIRECT-type algorithms for black-box optimization problems. In this paper, we evaluate three well-performing DIRECT-type methods from a recent extensive numerical study on the BBOB noiseless testbed in dimensions 2, 3, 5, 10, and 20. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these algorithms on different classes of functions and provide a comparison with the original DIRECT method, as well as with three other well-established methods: RL-SHADE, L-BFGS-B, and SLSQP.
Description
Citation
GECCO '23 Companion: Companion Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. 2023, p. 1620-1627.
https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3583133.3596308
https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3583133.3596308
Document type
Peer-reviewed
Document version
Published version
Date of access to the full text
Language of document
en
Study field
Comittee
Date of acceptance
Defence
Result of defence
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

0000-0002-4372-2105 