Porovnání charakteristik předimpregnovaných a konvenčních laminátů s uhlíkovými vlákny

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Jones, Phillip

Mark

B

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta strojního inženýrství

ORCID

Abstract

The focus of this thesis is a comparison of pre-impregnated and conventional carbon fibre laminates. The first part focuses on the production process of carbon fibre composites from the process of converting PAN to carbon fibres to the lay-up and curing process of completed parts. The second section includes numerical comparisons of different types of carbon fibre. The data is set up in a fashion to demonstrate the improvements in carbon fibre mechanical properties by comparing outdated carbon fibre to the newest fibre on the market. The included tables aid in the process of choosing the right type of carbon fibre for each specific application.
The focus of this thesis is a comparison of pre-impregnated and conventional carbon fibre laminates. The first part focuses on the production process of carbon fibre composites from the process of converting PAN to carbon fibres to the lay-up and curing process of completed parts. The second section includes numerical comparisons of different types of carbon fibre. The data is set up in a fashion to demonstrate the improvements in carbon fibre mechanical properties by comparing outdated carbon fibre to the newest fibre on the market. The included tables aid in the process of choosing the right type of carbon fibre for each specific application.

Description

Citation

JONES, P. Porovnání charakteristik předimpregnovaných a konvenčních laminátů s uhlíkovými vlákny [online]. Brno: Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta strojního inženýrství. 2023.

Document type

Document version

Date of access to the full text

Language of document

en

Study field

bez specializace

Comittee

doc. Ing. Ivo Jebáček, Ph.D. (předseda) doc. Ing. František Šebek, Ph.D. (místopředseda) doc. Ing. Vít Jan, Ph.D. (člen) doc. Ing. Jaroslav Juračka, Ph.D. (člen) Ing. Tomáš Katrňák (člen)

Date of acceptance

2023-06-19

Defence

The student first presented the results he achieved in his work. The committee then got to know the assessment of the supervisor and reviewer. The student then answered the reviewer's questions and other questions from the committee. Q1: Why to focus on ‘Toray’ materials? Any other producer on the market? A1: Japan company, the largest carbon-fibre producer, they provide a lot of details and material properties. Q2: What is the best result you emphasize? A2: Improvement in the epoxy and towing of the fibres, made by Toray. Q3: If to manufacture a product, can one define the right material based on the thesis? A3: Unfortunately, there was no price available for the materials, even after high effort to get it. Based on the opinion of the reviewer´s and the supervisor's assessment, the presentation and the student's answers to the questions, the committee decided to rate the work with a grade of B, very good.

Result of defence

práce byla úspěšně obhájena

DOI

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Citace PRO