Biogenic amines and hygienic quality of lucerne silage
Loading...
Date
2016-01-01
Authors
Mlejnková, Veronika
Horký, Pavel
Komínková, Markéta
Skládanka, Jiří
Hodulíková, Lucia
Adam, Vojtěch
Mlček, Jiří
Juříková, Tunde
Sochor, Jiří
ORCID
Advisor
Referee
Mark
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
De Gruyter Open
Altmetrics
Abstract
This experiment examined the influence of two different silage additives of biological (Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Enterococcus faecium, enzyme xylanase) and chemical (43% formic acid, 30% ammonium formate, 10% propionic acid, 2% benzoic acid) types on biogenic amines concentration, nutrient content, fermentation process, and microbiologic indicators in lucerne (Medicago sativa) silage after 90 days of fermentation. The biological additive significantly (P < 0.05) increased putrescine (+51%), lactic acid (+11%) and protein content (+11%) in comparison with control silage. It significantly decreased cadaverine (-29%), histamine (-57%), spermidine (-15%), spermine (-55%), acetic acid (-40%), ethanol (-55%), ammonium (-25%) and ash (-9%). After the chemical-additive treatment, greater amounts of histamine and tyramine were recorded. Significant decrease was observed in the concentrations of putrescine (-18%), cadaverine (-55%), spermidine (-47%), spermine (-45%), lactic acid (-16%), acetic acid (-46%), ammonium (-59%), ash (-13%) and fat (-24%). Populations of bacteria associated with lactic acid fermentation, moulds, yeasts, enterobacteria and total microorganisms count were also influenced. Both biological and chemical additives can be highly recommended for producing high-quality silages meeting hygienic requirements. In lucerne silage, the chemical preservative showed a stronger effect in achieving the health safety of silage compared to the biological inoculant.
Description
Citation
Open Life Sciences. 2016, vol. 11, issue 1, p. 280-286.
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/biol-2016-0037/html
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/biol-2016-0037/html
Document type
Peer-reviewed
Document version
Published version
Date of access to the full text
Language of document
en
Study field
Comittee
Date of acceptance
Defence
Result of defence
Document licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/