Are smart service manufacturing providers different in cooperation and innovation flexibility, in innovation performance and business performance from non-smart service manufacturing providers?
dc.contributor.author | Kaňovská, Lucie | cs |
dc.coverage.issue | 4 | cs |
dc.coverage.volume | 12 | cs |
dc.date.issued | 2020-12-30 | cs |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose. To overcome the challenges posed by increasing competition, many traditional manufacturing companies are moving from the mere production of manufacturing goods to the integration of services that are more or less integrated into the product, which is also due to the constant development of the industry. Moreover, many manufacturing companies offer products that use smart technologies. This paper focuses on the importance of smart service provision for cooperation and innovation flexibility, innovation performance and business performance in small and medium manufacturing companies. The paper aims to find out if smart service manufacturing providers are different in cooperation and innovation flexibility and innovation and business performance from non-smart service manufacturing providers. Methodology. To better understand the issue, research was undertaken in 112 small and medium manufacturing companies of the Czech Republic. The problems of smart service provision were investigated in the first empirical research held among the electric engineering companies (CZ-NACE 26 and CZ-NACE 27) in the Czech Republic. Results. The findings show that smart service manufacturing providers are better in internal cooperation flexibility, innovation flexibility related to product and to accompanying services and in business performance than non-smart service manufacturing providers. | en |
dc.format | text | cs |
dc.format.extent | 105-116 | cs |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | cs |
dc.identifier.citation | Engineering Management in Production and Services. 2020, vol. 12, issue 4, p. 105-116. | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2478/emj-2020-0031 | cs |
dc.identifier.issn | 2543-6597 | cs |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-2797-7973 | cs |
dc.identifier.other | 167472 | cs |
dc.identifier.scopus | 56481574800 | cs |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11012/196585 | |
dc.language.iso | en | cs |
dc.publisher | Sciendo | cs |
dc.relation.ispartof | Engineering Management in Production and Services | cs |
dc.relation.uri | https://www.sciendo.com/article/10.2478/emj-2020-0031 | cs |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | cs |
dc.rights.access | openAccess | cs |
dc.rights.sherpa | http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/2543-6597/ | cs |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | cs |
dc.subject | smart services | en |
dc.subject | cooperation flexibility | en |
dc.subject | innovation flexibility | en |
dc.subject | innovation performance | en |
dc.subject | business performance | en |
dc.subject | manufacturing companies | en |
dc.subject | smart services | |
dc.subject | cooperation flexibility | |
dc.subject | innovation flexibility | |
dc.subject | innovation performance | |
dc.subject | business performance | |
dc.subject | manufacturing companies | |
dc.title | Are smart service manufacturing providers different in cooperation and innovation flexibility, in innovation performance and business performance from non-smart service manufacturing providers? | en |
dc.type.driver | article | en |
dc.type.status | Peer-reviewed | en |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en |
sync.item.dbid | VAV-167472 | en |
sync.item.dbtype | VAV | en |
sync.item.insts | 2025.02.03 15:43:37 | en |
sync.item.modts | 2025.01.17 22:32:22 | en |
thesis.grantor | Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta podnikatelská. Ústav managementu | cs |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- 10.2478_emj20200031.pdf
- Size:
- 624.2 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- 10.2478_emj20200031.pdf