A comparison of two modal analysis methods: An impact hammer versus laser vibrometry
dc.contributor.author | Krejčí, Jakub | cs |
dc.contributor.author | Beneš, Petr | cs |
dc.coverage.issue | 5 | cs |
dc.coverage.volume | 60 | cs |
dc.date.issued | 2020-11-19 | cs |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents a comparative experimental-analytical study on the performance of Multi-Input Single-Output (MISO) and Single-Input Multi-Output (SIMO) techniques to identify the modal properties of a cantilever beam. A 2-D laser interferometry was employed to perform the SIMO modal test, while for the MISO test configuration, a conventional accelerometer was used to measure the response of the structure. Comparing the experimentally-measured natural frequencies with those calculated by the FEM model, a maximum difference of 4% between natural frequencies was observed. The repeatability of both techniques is also investigated in this paper and it is shown that the difference between modal properties identified under different operators is less than 0.5% for both the MISO and SIMO techniques. | en |
dc.format | text | cs |
dc.format.extent | 420-427 | cs |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | cs |
dc.identifier.citation | Acta Polytechnica (on-line). 2020, vol. 60, issue 5, p. 420-427. | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.14311/AP.2020.60.0420 | cs |
dc.identifier.issn | 1805-2363 | cs |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-6289-5119 | cs |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-3712-7107 | cs |
dc.identifier.other | 156812 | cs |
dc.identifier.researcherid | V-2836-2017 | cs |
dc.identifier.researcherid | B-1805-2008 | cs |
dc.identifier.scopus | 7006828688 | cs |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11012/196547 | |
dc.language.iso | en | cs |
dc.publisher | Czech Technical University in Prague | cs |
dc.relation.ispartof | Acta Polytechnica (on-line) | cs |
dc.relation.uri | https://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/ap/article/view/6050 | cs |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International | cs |
dc.rights.access | openAccess | cs |
dc.rights.sherpa | http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1805-2363/ | cs |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | cs |
dc.subject | modal analysis | en |
dc.subject | free beam | en |
dc.subject | 2D interferometer | en |
dc.subject | COMSOL | en |
dc.subject | ModalVIEW | en |
dc.title | A comparison of two modal analysis methods: An impact hammer versus laser vibrometry | en |
dc.type.driver | article | en |
dc.type.status | Peer-reviewed | en |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en |
sync.item.dbid | VAV-156812 | en |
sync.item.dbtype | VAV | en |
sync.item.insts | 2025.02.03 15:39:28 | en |
sync.item.modts | 2025.01.17 16:47:14 | en |
thesis.grantor | Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta elektrotechniky a komunikačních technologií. Ústav automatizace a měřicí techniky | cs |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- 6050Article Text2155711020201102.pdf
- Size:
- 2.49 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- 6050Article Text2155711020201102.pdf