A comparison of two modal analysis methods: An impact hammer versus laser vibrometry

dc.contributor.authorKrejčí, Jakubcs
dc.contributor.authorBeneš, Petrcs
dc.coverage.issue5cs
dc.coverage.volume60cs
dc.date.issued2020-11-19cs
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a comparative experimental-analytical study on the performance of Multi-Input Single-Output (MISO) and Single-Input Multi-Output (SIMO) techniques to identify the modal properties of a cantilever beam. A 2-D laser interferometry was employed to perform the SIMO modal test, while for the MISO test configuration, a conventional accelerometer was used to measure the response of the structure. Comparing the experimentally-measured natural frequencies with those calculated by the FEM model, a maximum difference of 4% between natural frequencies was observed. The repeatability of both techniques is also investigated in this paper and it is shown that the difference between modal properties identified under different operators is less than 0.5% for both the MISO and SIMO techniques.en
dc.formattextcs
dc.format.extent420-427cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfcs
dc.identifier.citationActa Polytechnica (on-line). 2020, vol. 60, issue 5, p. 420-427.en
dc.identifier.doi10.14311/AP.2020.60.0420cs
dc.identifier.issn1805-2363cs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6289-5119cs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3712-7107cs
dc.identifier.other156812cs
dc.identifier.researcheridV-2836-2017cs
dc.identifier.researcheridB-1805-2008cs
dc.identifier.scopus7006828688cs
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11012/196547
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherCzech Technical University in Praguecs
dc.relation.ispartofActa Polytechnica (on-line)cs
dc.relation.urihttps://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/ap/article/view/6050cs
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalcs
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.rights.sherpahttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1805-2363/cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectmodal analysisen
dc.subjectfree beamen
dc.subject2D interferometeren
dc.subjectCOMSOLen
dc.subjectModalVIEWen
dc.titleA comparison of two modal analysis methods: An impact hammer versus laser vibrometryen
dc.type.driverarticleen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
sync.item.dbidVAV-156812en
sync.item.dbtypeVAVen
sync.item.insts2025.02.03 15:39:28en
sync.item.modts2025.01.17 16:47:14en
thesis.grantorVysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta elektrotechniky a komunikačních technologií. Ústav automatizace a měřicí technikycs
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
6050Article Text2155711020201102.pdf
Size:
2.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
6050Article Text2155711020201102.pdf