Eye Movements as Indicators of Deception: A Machine Learning Approach

dc.contributor.authorde Leon Martinez, Santiago Josecs
dc.contributor.authorFoucher, Valentincs
dc.contributor.authorMoro, Robertcs
dc.date.issued2025-05-25cs
dc.description.abstractGaze may enhance the robustness of lie detectors, but remains under-studied. This study evaluated the efficacy of AI models (using fixations, saccades, blinks, and pupil size) for detecting deception in Concealed Information Tests across two datasets. The first, collected with Eyelink 1000, contains gaze data from a computerized experiment in which 87 participants revealed, concealed, or faked the value of a previously selected card. The second, collected with Pupil Neon, involved 37 participants performing a similar task but facing an experimenter. AI models (XGBoost) achieved accuracies of up to 74\% in a binary classification task (Revealing vs. Concealing) and 49\% in a more challenging three-classification task (Revealing vs. Concealing vs. Faking). Feature analysis identified saccade number, duration and amplitude along with maximum pupil size as the most important for deception prediction. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using gaze and AI to enhance lie detectors and encourage future research that may improve on this.en
dc.description.abstractGaze may enhance the robustness of lie detectors, but remains under-studied. This study evaluated the efficacy of AI models (using fixations, saccades, blinks, and pupil size) for detecting deception in Concealed Information Tests across two datasets. The first, collected with Eyelink 1000, contains gaze data from a computerized experiment in which 87 participants revealed, concealed, or faked the value of a previously selected card. The second, collected with Pupil Neon, involved 37 participants performing a similar task but facing an experimenter. AI models (XGBoost) achieved accuracies of up to 74\% in a binary classification task (Revealing vs. Concealing) and 49\% in a more challenging three-classification task (Revealing vs. Concealing vs. Faking). Feature analysis identified saccade number, duration and amplitude along with maximum pupil size as the most important for deception prediction. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using gaze and AI to enhance lie detectors and encourage future research that may improve on this.en
dc.formattextcs
dc.format.extent1-7cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfcs
dc.identifier.citationETRA '25: Proceedings of the 2025 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications. 2025, p. 1-7.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/3715669.3723129cs
dc.identifier.other194215cs
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11012/255187
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherACMcs
dc.relation.ispartofETRA '25: Proceedings of the 2025 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applicationscs
dc.relation.urihttps://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3715669.3723129cs
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalcs
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectEye Movementsen
dc.subjectGazeen
dc.subjectPupilen
dc.subjectDeception Detectionen
dc.subjectConcealed Information Testen
dc.subjectMachine Learningen
dc.subject<br>Feature Importanceen
dc.subjectEye Movements
dc.subjectGaze
dc.subjectPupil
dc.subjectDeception Detection
dc.subjectConcealed Information Test
dc.subjectMachine Learning
dc.subject<br>Feature Importance
dc.titleEye Movements as Indicators of Deception: A Machine Learning Approachen
dc.title.alternativeEye Movements as Indicators of Deception: A Machine Learning Approachen
dc.type.driverconferenceObjecten
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
sync.item.dbidVAV-194215en
sync.item.dbtypeVAVen
sync.item.insts2025.10.14 14:13:23en
sync.item.modts2025.10.14 10:01:58en
thesis.grantorVysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta informačních technologií. Ústav počítačové grafiky a multimédiícs

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
3715669.3723129.pdf
Size:
561.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
file 3715669.3723129.pdf