A Two-Stage Optimization Framework for Radar Jamming Effectiveness Evaluation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Advisor

Referee

Mark

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Společnost pro radioelektronické inženýrství

ORCID

Altmetrics

Abstract

In complex electromagnetic environments, radar signals intercepted by jammers often contain biased data due to factors such as radar mode switching, electromagnetic interference, and receiver noise. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a two-stage optimization framework for jamming effect evaluation from the jammerâ s perspective. In the first stage, a pre-evaluation is conducted using an entropy-optimized K-means discretization algorithm (KDEOA) to adaptively partition pulse descriptor word (PDW) parameters, enhancing robustness against noise. A GCSAO-LSSVM model is then employed to improve classification accuracy through optimal parameter tuning and a periodic oscillation mutation strategy. In the second stage, an improved entropy weight method (IEWM) integrating Tsallis entropy, kernel density standardization, and game theory is used for objective weighting, followed by an enhanced TOPSIS method (ITOPSIS) incorporating interquartile range standardiza-tion and dynamic ideal solution fusion for quantitative scoring. Experimental results demonstrate that the pro-posed framework achieves the highest pre-evaluation accuracy across all noise levels (up to 50% contamination), with IEWM exhibiting the lowest weight variation rate (0.11â 0.23%) and ITOPSIS showing the strongest correlation (0.7290) with baseline scores under high noise. The main limitations include sensitivity to severe signal distortion and assumption of stable radar behavior. This approach enables accurate, non-cooperative jamming assessment and supports robust decision-making in cognitive electronic warfare.

Description

Citation

Radioengineering. 2025 vol. 34, iss. 4, p. 660-673. ISSN 1210-2512
https://www.radioeng.cz/fulltexts/2025/25_04_0660_0673.pdf

Document type

Peer-reviewed

Document version

Published version

Date of access to the full text

Language of document

en

Study field

Comittee

Date of acceptance

Defence

Result of defence

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license
Citace PRO