Does Digestate Dose Affect Fodder Security and Nutritive Value?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKoláčková, Ivanacs
dc.contributor.authorSmolková, Barboracs
dc.contributor.authorLátal, Oldřichcs
dc.contributor.authorSkaličková, Sylviecs
dc.contributor.authorSkládanka, Jiřícs
dc.contributor.authorHorký, Pavelcs
dc.contributor.authorKnot, Pavelcs
dc.contributor.authorHammerschmiedt, Terezacs
dc.contributor.authorKintl, Antoníncs
dc.contributor.authorHolátko, Jiřícs
dc.contributor.authorPozdíšek, Jancs
dc.contributor.authorBrtnický, Martincs
dc.coverage.issue2cs
dc.coverage.volume12cs
dc.date.issued2022-01-19cs
dc.description.abstractWith the rising interest in digestate use as a fertilizer on permanent cultures, there is a need to examine its effects on food and feed quality. This study is focused on the use of digestate in grassland fertilization and its effects on nutritive value parameters such as mycotoxin contamination (deoxynivalenol, aflatoxin, and T-2 toxin) and nutrient content (crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, ash, nitrogen-free extract, digestibility of organic matter, acid detergent fiber, and ash-free neutral detergent fiber). The experiment was carried out in the Czech Republic, and the effects of fertilization regime, year, and harvest date (summer and fall cuts) on nutritive value were observed. An effect of the year on DON, AFB1, and T-2 contamination levels was observed. An effect of the harvest or fertilization regime on mycotoxin contamination was not observed. Significant differences were observed in the content of all nutrients, except ash, depending on the year. Differences were found only in the case of ADF levels, depending on the harvest date, as well; however, no differences were found between fertilization regimes. Our findings suggest that digestate does not negatively affect fodder in terms of nutritive value nor safety.en
dc.formattextcs
dc.format.extent1-11cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfcs
dc.identifier.citationAgriculture. 2022, vol. 12, issue 2, p. 1-11.en
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/agriculture12020133cs
dc.identifier.issn2077-0472cs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5237-722Xcs
dc.identifier.other182185cs
dc.identifier.researcheridI-4939-2018cs
dc.identifier.scopus56595240100cs
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11012/209168
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherMDPIcs
dc.relation.ispartofAgriculturecs
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/2/133cs
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalcs
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.rights.sherpahttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/2077-0472/cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectbiogas planten
dc.subjectgrass forageen
dc.subjectWeende analysisen
dc.subjectfertilizationen
dc.subjectmycotoxinen
dc.subjectDONen
dc.subjectAFLen
dc.subjectT-2 toxinen
dc.titleDoes Digestate Dose Affect Fodder Security and Nutritive Value?en
dc.type.driverarticleen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
sync.item.dbidVAV-182185en
sync.item.dbtypeVAVen
sync.item.insts2025.02.03 15:38:11en
sync.item.modts2025.01.17 16:54:49en
thesis.grantorVysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta chemická. Ústav chemie a technologie ochrany životního prostředícs
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
agriculture1200133.pdf
Size:
288.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
agriculture1200133.pdf
Download
Collections
Ústav chemie a technologie ochrany životního prostředí