Cell segmentation methods for label-free contrast microscopy: review and comprehensive comparison
Loading...
Date
Authors
Vičar, Tomáš
Balvan, Jan
Jaroš, Josef
Jug, Florian
Kolář, Radim
Masařík, Michal
Gumulec, Jaromír
Advisor
Referee
Mark
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
BMC
Altmetrics
Abstract
Because of its non-destructive nature, label-free imaging is an important strategy for studying biological processes. However, routine microscopic techniques like phase contrast or DIC suffer from shadow-cast artifacts making automatic segmentation challenging. The aim of this study was to compare the segmentation efficacy of published steps of segmentation work-flow (image reconstruction, foreground segmentation, cell detection (seed-point extraction) and cell (instance) segmentation) on a dataset of the same cells from multiple contrast microscopic modalities.
Because of its non-destructive nature, label-free imaging is an important strategy for studying biological processes. However, routine microscopic techniques like phase contrast or DIC suffer from shadow-cast artifacts making automatic segmentation challenging. The aim of this study was to compare the segmentation efficacy of published steps of segmentation work-flow (image reconstruction, foreground segmentation, cell detection (seed-point extraction) and cell (instance) segmentation) on a dataset of the same cells from multiple contrast microscopic modalities.
Because of its non-destructive nature, label-free imaging is an important strategy for studying biological processes. However, routine microscopic techniques like phase contrast or DIC suffer from shadow-cast artifacts making automatic segmentation challenging. The aim of this study was to compare the segmentation efficacy of published steps of segmentation work-flow (image reconstruction, foreground segmentation, cell detection (seed-point extraction) and cell (instance) segmentation) on a dataset of the same cells from multiple contrast microscopic modalities.
Description
Keywords
Microscopy , Cell segmentation , Image reconstruction , Methods comparison , Differential contrast image , Quantitative phase imaging , Laplacian of Gaussians , Microscopy , Cell segmentation , Image reconstruction , Methods comparison , Differential contrast image , Quantitative phase imaging , Laplacian of Gaussians
Citation
BMC BIOINFORMATICS. 2019, vol. 20, issue 1, p. 1-25.
https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-019-2880-8
https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-019-2880-8
Document type
Peer-reviewed
Document version
Published version
Date of access to the full text
Language of document
en
Study field
Comittee
Date of acceptance
Defence
Result of defence
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

0000-0002-9136-7873 