Selection of a suitable C02 sensor for indoor air quality assessment

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Advisor

Referee

Mark

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Vysoké učení technické v Brně,Fakulta stavební

ORCID

Altmetrics

Abstract

This article compares eight types of CO2 sensors using NDIR technology for accuracy, response time, and acquisition costs. The experiment included static and dynamic tests in a chamber and a duct. The Testo 935 and Rotronic CL11/CP11 sensors showed high accuracy and fast response, while the Winsen MH-Z16 offered the best performance-to-cost ratio. Other tested sensors – NetAtmo, Comet S3532, LaskaKit SCD41 and MH-Z14 exhibited inaccuracies, making them unsuitable for scientific applications.

Description

Citation

Juniorstav 2025: Selected Papers. Proceedings 27th International Scientific Conference Of Civil Engineering, s. 1-11. ISBN .
https://juniorstav.fce.vutbr.cz/proceedings2025/

Document type

Peer-reviewed

Document version

Published version

Date of access to the full text

Language of document

en

Study field

Comittee

Date of acceptance

Defence

Result of defence

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Citace PRO