Jednorázové a pravidelné investice na světových akciových trzích
Loading...
Files
Date
2013-12
Authors
ORCID
Advisor
Referee
Mark
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Vysoké učení technické v Brně, Fakulta podnikatelská
Abstract
Purpose of the article: The focus of this article are lump sum and regular investments (dollar cost averaging
method) on selected world stock markets in the period from 1990 to 2010 for different investment horizons.
Scientific aim: The aim of this Paper is to compare and evaluate lump sum and regular investments (dollar cost
averaging method) on important world stock markets according to the return-risk profile in the period from
1990 to 2010 for different investment horizons. The following world stock markets were chosen: US stock
market (S&P 500 Total Return index), European stock market (S&P Europe 350 Total Return index) and Japan
stock market (S&P TOPIX 150 Total Return index).
Methodology: The Methodology used in this Paper is based on the quantification of return and risk indicators
for different investment horizons. The following investment horizons were chosen: 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
and 10 years. The Paper works with quarterly data of selected indices in the period from 1990 to 2010. Indices
are used in total return form, i.e. dividends and their reinvesting on the same market are included. Standard
deviation is used as the risk indicator and internal rate of return is used as the return indicator. The return-risk
profile is quantified as the share of the return indicator and the risk indicator.
Findings: Regular investment through the dollar cost averaging method brought substantially better (higher)
values of the return-risk profile than lump sum investments made during the same period on the same market,
mostly over short-term investment horizons (one-year and three-year horizons). Over longer investment
horizons, regular investment with the dollar cost averaging method was still bringing better results than the
return-risk profile, but given the trend of a growing US and European market, more return could be achieved
with lump sum investments than regular investments made over the same period. As the Japanese stock market
was stagnating, the gap between the results of the return-risk profile for regular and lump sum investments was
closing with growing length of the investment horizon.
Conclusions: Regular investments with the dollar cost averaging method are desirable particularly for
short-term investment horizons (1-year and 3-year horizons) where volatility can be reduced thanks to the
right investment timing, but the losses following a slump on the stock market are not so vast as in one-time
investments (thanks to cost averaging). On the other hand, the recommendation to invest over the one- or threeyear
investment horizon can partially contradict the recommendations for stock markets. Here, the shortest
recommended investment horizon is five years. Regular investment with the dollar cost averaging method
however significantly reduces the stock market risk also over these investment horizons when compared with
one-time investments. As this Paper has however shown, even when the results of the return-risk profile were
not so much better for longer investment horizons in regular investments with the dollar cost averaging method
than for short-term investment horizons, investments with this method can be still clearly recommended also
for these investment horizons – both for growing stock markets, and for long-term stagnating markets.
Description
Citation
Trendy ekonomiky a managementu. 2013, VII, č. 16, s. 96-108. ISSN 1802-8527.
http://www.fbm.vutbr.cz/cs/fakulta/vedecky-casopis/aktualni-cislo/1885-trendy-ekonomiky-a-managementu-cislo-16-rocnik-vii
http://www.fbm.vutbr.cz/cs/fakulta/vedecky-casopis/aktualni-cislo/1885-trendy-ekonomiky-a-managementu-cislo-16-rocnik-vii
Document type
Peer-reviewed
Document version
Published version
Date of access to the full text
Language of document
cs
Study field
Comittee
Date of acceptance
Defence
Result of defence
Document licence
© Vysoké učení technické v Brně, Fakulta podnikatelská