Implant Preference and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: All-Polyethylene and Contralateral Metal-Backed Tibial Components

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorNachtnebl, Lubošcs
dc.contributor.authorApostolopoulos, Vasileioscs
dc.contributor.authorMahdal, Michalcs
dc.contributor.authorPazourek, Lukášcs
dc.contributor.authorBrančík, Pavelcs
dc.contributor.authorValoušek, Tomášcs
dc.contributor.authorBoháč, Petrcs
dc.contributor.authorTomáš, Tomášcs
dc.coverage.issue23cs
dc.coverage.volume12cs
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-22T10:45:26Z
dc.date.available2024-02-22T10:45:26Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-30cs
dc.description.abstractNumerous studies have compared metal-backed components (MBTs) and all-polyethylene tibial components (APTs), but none of them specifically analysed the clinical results and the overall patient preference in patients who had undergone a staged bilateral knee replacement. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical results, perceived range of motion, and overall implant preference among patients who had undergone staged bilateral knee replacement with an APT and contralateral knee replacement with MBTs. A dataset of 62 patients from a single centre who underwent staged bilateral TKA between 2009 and 2022 was selected and retrospectively analysed. Tibial component removal was performed in three knees overall, all of which had MBTs. The mean measured Knee Score (KS) of knees with APTs was 78.37 and that of contralateral knees with MBTs was 77.4. The mean measured Function (FS) of knees with APTs was 78.22, and that of contralateral knees with MBs was 76.29. The mean flexion angle of knees with APTs was 103.8 and that for knees with MBTs was 101.04 degrees. A total of 54.8% of the patients preferred the knee that received APTs over contralateral MBTs. In our cohort, TKA with an APT in one knee and an MBT in the contralateral knee recorded similar clinical results and perceived ranges of motion. Patients in general preferred the knee that received an APT over contralateral knee with an MBT.en
dc.formattextcs
dc.format.extent1-9cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfcs
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Medicine. 2023, vol. 12, issue 23, p. 1-9.en
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm12237438cs
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383cs
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0006-8718-101Xcs
dc.identifier.other185584cs
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11012/245173
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherMDPIcs
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Medicinecs
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/23/7438cs
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalcs
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.rights.sherpahttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/2077-0383/cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectbilateral knee replacementen
dc.subjecttotal knee arthroplastyen
dc.subjectall-polyethylene tibiaen
dc.subjectmetal-backed tibiaen
dc.subjectstaged bilateral knee arthroplastyen
dc.titleImplant Preference and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: All-Polyethylene and Contralateral Metal-Backed Tibial Componentsen
dc.type.driverarticleen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
sync.item.dbidVAV-185584en
sync.item.dbtypeVAVen
sync.item.insts2024.02.22 11:45:26en
sync.item.modts2024.02.22 11:13:36en
thesis.grantorVysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta strojního inženýrství. Ústav mechaniky těles, mechatroniky a biomechanikycs
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
jcm1207438.pdf
Size:
2.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
file jcm1207438.pdf
Download
Collections
Ústav mechaniky těles, mechatroniky a biomechaniky