Statistical power of goodness-of-fit tests for type I left-censored data

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Fusek, Michal

Advisor

Referee

Mark

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Austrian Statistical Society
Altmetrics

Abstract

Type I doubly left-censored data often arise in environmental studies. In this paper, the power of the most frequently used goodness-of-fit tests (Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramér-von Mises, Anderson-Darling) is studied considering various sample sizes and degrees of censoring. Attention is paid to testing of the composite hypothesis that the data has a specific distribution with unknown parameters, which are estimated using the maximum likelihood method. Performance of the tests is assessed by means of Monte Carlo simulations for several distributions, specifically the Weibull, lognormal and gamma distributions, which are among the most frequently used distributions for modelling of environmental data. Finally, the tests are used for identification of the distribution of musk concentrations if fish tissue.
Type I doubly left-censored data often arise in environmental studies. In this paper, the power of the most frequently used goodness-of-fit tests (Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramér-von Mises, Anderson-Darling) is studied considering various sample sizes and degrees of censoring. Attention is paid to testing of the composite hypothesis that the data has a specific distribution with unknown parameters, which are estimated using the maximum likelihood method. Performance of the tests is assessed by means of Monte Carlo simulations for several distributions, specifically the Weibull, lognormal and gamma distributions, which are among the most frequently used distributions for modelling of environmental data. Finally, the tests are used for identification of the distribution of musk concentrations if fish tissue.

Description

Citation

Austrian Journal of Statistics. 2023, vol. 52, issue 1, p. 51-61.
https://www.ajs.or.at/index.php/ajs/article/view/1348

Document type

Peer-reviewed

Document version

Published version

Date of access to the full text

Language of document

en

Study field

Comittee

Date of acceptance

Defence

Result of defence

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Citace PRO