Evaluate Database Management System Quality By Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methodolog

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Al Nawaiseh, Asmaa Jameel
Albtoush, Audi
Al-Msiedeen, Ra´fat
Al Nawaiseh, Sabah Jamil

Advisor

Referee

Mark

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Institute of Automation and Computer Science, Brno University of Technology

ORCID

Altmetrics

Abstract

Any organization that intends to use component-based software development, like outsourcing software, must first evaluate existing components against system requirements to find the best fit among many alternatives. As a result, there should be a mechanism to help with decision-making. Our proposed methodology tries to select the best alternative among available components, using the best decision-making approach. As an integrated method for order preference, the methodology in this paper uses two well-known criterion decision-making procedures, namely Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). By analyzing and selecting the optimal solution among a variety of Out Sourcing (OS) modules, the new model design makes the decision-making process easier. We evaluated two software attributes and predicted which was more effective. In this case, the advantage of utilizing AHP is that it allows the developer to evaluate the structure of the OS selection problem and calculate weights for the chosen criteria. After that, the SAW technique is used to calculate the alternatives ratings for OS components. The integration strategy used in our model and the resulting preference indication, which is produced as an explicit numeric value.

Description

Citation

Mendel. 2022 vol. 28, č. 2, s. 67-75. ISSN 1803-3814
https://mendel-journal.org/index.php/mendel/article/view/202

Document type

Peer-reviewed

Document version

Published version

Date of access to the full text

Language of document

en

Study field

Comittee

Date of acceptance

Defence

Result of defence

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license
Citace PRO