Coupling of photovoltaics with neurostimulation electrodes-optical to electrolytic transduction

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2024-08-01
Authors
Jakešová, Marie
Kunovský, Ondřej
Gablech, Imrich
Khodagholy, Dion
Gelinas, Jennifer N.
Glowacki, Eric Daniel
Advisor
Referee
Mark
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
IOP Publishing Ltd
Altmetrics
Abstract
Objective. The wireless transfer of power for driving implantable neural stimulation devices has garnered significant attention in the bioelectronics field. This study explores the potential of photovoltaic (PV) power transfer, utilizing tissue-penetrating deep-red light-a novel and promising approach that has received less attention compared to traditional induction or ultrasound techniques. Our objective is to critically assess key parameters for directly powering neurostimulation electrodes with PVs, converting light impulses into neurostimulation currents. Approach. We systematically investigate varying PV cell size, optional series configurations, and coupling with microelectrodes fabricated from a range of materials such as Pt, TiN, IrO x , Ti, W, PtO x , Au, or poly(3,4 ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate). Additionally, two types of PVs, ultrathin organic PVs and monocrystalline silicon PVs, are compared. These combinations are employed to drive pairs of electrodes with different sizes and impedances. The readout method involves measuring electrolytic current using a straightforward amplifier circuit. Main results. Optimal PV selection is crucial, necessitating sufficiently large PV cells to generate the desired photocurrent. Arranging PVs in series is essential to produce the appropriate voltage for driving current across electrode/electrolyte impedances. By carefully choosing the PV arrangement and electrode type, it becomes possible to emulate electrical stimulation protocols in terms of charge and frequency. An important consideration is whether the circuit is photovoltage-limited or photocurrent-limited. High charge-injection capacity electrodes made from pseudo-faradaic materials impose a photocurrent limit, while more capacitive materials like Pt are photovoltage-limited. Although organic PVs exhibit lower efficiency than silicon PVs, in many practical scenarios, stimulation current is primarily limited by the electrodes rather than the PV driver, leading to potential parity between the two types. Significance. This study provides a foundational guide for designing a PV-powered neurostimulation circuit. The insights gained are applicable to both in vitro and in vivo applications, offering a resource to the neural engineering community.
Description
Citation
Journal of Neural Engineering. 2024, vol. 21, issue 4, 13 p.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-2552/ad593d
Document type
Peer-reviewed
Document version
Published version
Date of access to the full text
Language of document
en
Study field
Comittee
Date of acceptance
Defence
Result of defence
Document licence
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Citace PRO