Fracture Surface Roughness of Ti-Scaffold Filaments with Different Microporosity
Loading...
Date
Advisor
Referee
Mark
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Altmetrics
Abstract
implants. The previous research has shown that the titanium scaffolds with porous filaments (14% microporosity) exhibited better fatigue resistance than those with compact filaments (6% microporosity). This was primarily attributed to fatigue crack growth shielding mechanisms induced by crack-pore interactions and by an extension of fatigue crack path in the porous filaments. A quantification of these effects demands a determination of fracture surface roughness parameters of both types of filaments, which is the main aim of this article. Selected roughness parameters Sa (arithmetical mean height), Sv (maximum valley depth) and Sdr (developed interfacial area ratio) of fracture surfaces of scaffold filaments after cyclic three-point bending tests were determined using the confocal laser microscope Olympus LEXT™ OLS5100 according to ISO 25178. Each sample was subjected to 7 measurements on small surfaces of size 4500 m2 spread over the fatigue fracture surface and the average value with the standard deviation was computed. All the average values of roughness parameters for the porous samples were found to be higher than those for the compound fibers. These parameters decreased with an increasing number of cycles to fracture Nf in the range Nf (102, 105). The statistical analysis of fracture surface roughness will serve as a benchmark for a currently developed model of the fatigue crack growth in metallic materials of variable porosity which will improve our understanding the mechanistic response of scaffolds and enable the optimization of their microporosity.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Procedia Structural Integrity. 2025, vol. 74, issue 1, p. 38-43.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452321625005268
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452321625005268
Document type
Peer-reviewed
Document version
Published version
Date of access to the full text
Language of document
en
Study field
Comittee
Date of acceptance
Defence
Result of defence
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

0000-0001-8847-075X 