Pulse-Echo Ultrasonic Verification of Silicate Surface Treatments Using an External-Excitation/Single-Receiver Configuration: ROC-Based Differentiation of Concrete Specimens

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Topolář, Libor
Kalina, Lukáš
Markusík, David
Cába, Vladislav
Sedlačík, Martin
Černý, Felix
Skibicky, Szymon
Bílek, Vlastimil

Advisor

Referee

Mark

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

MDPI
Altmetrics

Abstract

This study investigates a non-destructive, compact pulse-echo ultrasonic method that combines an external transmitter with a single receiving sensor to identify different surface treatments applied to cementitious materials. The primary objective was to evaluate whether treatment-induced acoustic changes could be reliably quantified using time-domain signal parameters. Three types of surface conditions were examined: untreated reference specimens (R), specimens treated with a standard lithium silicate solution (A), and those treated with an enriched formulation containing hexylene glycol (B) intended to enhance pore sealing via gelation. A broadband piezoelectric receiver collected the backscattered echoes, from which the maximum amplitude, root mean square (RMS) voltage, signal energy, and effective duration were extracted. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to quantify the discriminative power of each parameter. The results showed excellent classification performance between groups involving the B-treatment (AUC 0.96), whereas the R vs. A comparison yielded moderate separation (AUC 0.61). Optimal cut-off values were established using the Youden index, with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 96% in the best-performing scenarios. The results demonstrate that a single-receiver, one-sided pulse-echo arrangement coupled with straightforward amplitude metrics provides a rapid, cost-effective, and field-adaptable tool for the quality control of silicate-surface treatments. By translating laboratory ultrasonics into a practical on-site protocol, this study helps close the gap between the experimental characterisation and real-world implementation of surface-treatment verification.
This study investigates a non-destructive, compact pulse-echo ultrasonic method that combines an external transmitter with a single receiving sensor to identify different surface treatments applied to cementitious materials. The primary objective was to evaluate whether treatment-induced acoustic changes could be reliably quantified using time-domain signal parameters. Three types of surface conditions were examined: untreated reference specimens (R), specimens treated with a standard lithium silicate solution (A), and those treated with an enriched formulation containing hexylene glycol (B) intended to enhance pore sealing via gelation. A broadband piezoelectric receiver collected the backscattered echoes, from which the maximum amplitude, root mean square (RMS) voltage, signal energy, and effective duration were extracted. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to quantify the discriminative power of each parameter. The results showed excellent classification performance between groups involving the B-treatment (AUC 0.96), whereas the R vs. A comparison yielded moderate separation (AUC 0.61). Optimal cut-off values were established using the Youden index, with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 96% in the best-performing scenarios. The results demonstrate that a single-receiver, one-sided pulse-echo arrangement coupled with straightforward amplitude metrics provides a rapid, cost-effective, and field-adaptable tool for the quality control of silicate-surface treatments. By translating laboratory ultrasonics into a practical on-site protocol, this study helps close the gap between the experimental characterisation and real-world implementation of surface-treatment verification.

Description

Citation

Materials. 2025, vol. 18, issue 16, p. 1-22.
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/18/16/3765

Document type

Peer-reviewed

Document version

Published version

Date of access to the full text

Language of document

en

Study field

Comittee

Date of acceptance

Defence

Result of defence

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Citace PRO