Explicit and implicit method in nonlinear seismic analysis
Loading...
Date
Authors
Němec, Ivan
Štekbauer, Hynek
Gálová, Adéla
Vlk, Zbyněk
Advisor
Referee
Mark
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Altmetrics
Abstract
The paper deals with suitability of use of the explicit and implicit method in heavily nonlinear seismic analysis. Considering typical time of duration of earthquakes from several seconds to approximately twenty seconds, it would seem that use of the implicit method is definitely more suitable. The shape of accelerograms, however, requires quite short time steps. For the explicit method, on the other hand, very short time steps are required in order to obtain a stable solution. Both methods must be compared with respect to a heavily nonlinear response, typical for seismicity. Conclusions of the paper are made on the basis of detailed numerical study and may be very useful for practice.
The paper deals with suitability of use of the explicit and implicit method in heavily nonlinear seismic analysis. Considering typical time of duration of earthquakes from several seconds to approximately twenty seconds, it would seem that use of the implicit method is definitely more suitable. The shape of accelerograms, however, requires quite short time steps. For the explicit method, on the other hand, very short time steps are required in order to obtain a stable solution. Both methods must be compared with respect to a heavily nonlinear response, typical for seismicity. Conclusions of the paper are made on the basis of detailed numerical study and may be very useful for practice.
The paper deals with suitability of use of the explicit and implicit method in heavily nonlinear seismic analysis. Considering typical time of duration of earthquakes from several seconds to approximately twenty seconds, it would seem that use of the implicit method is definitely more suitable. The shape of accelerograms, however, requires quite short time steps. For the explicit method, on the other hand, very short time steps are required in order to obtain a stable solution. Both methods must be compared with respect to a heavily nonlinear response, typical for seismicity. Conclusions of the paper are made on the basis of detailed numerical study and may be very useful for practice.
Description
Keywords
Citation
MATEC web of conferences. 2017, vol. 107, 8 p.
https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/abs/2017/21/matecconf_dyn2017_00066/matecconf_dyn2017_00066.html
https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/abs/2017/21/matecconf_dyn2017_00066/matecconf_dyn2017_00066.html
Document type
Peer-reviewed
Document version
Published version
Date of access to the full text
Language of document
en
Study field
Comittee
Date of acceptance
Defence
Result of defence
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

0000-0002-8358-5002 