Non-numerical Bankruptcy Forecasting Based on Three Trends Values - Increasing, Constant, Decreasing

dc.contributor.authorBočková, Ninacs
dc.contributor.authorHornungová, Janacs
dc.contributor.authorDohnal, Mirkocs
dc.coverage.issue2cs
dc.coverage.volume20cs
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-16T13:55:57Z
dc.date.available2025-06-16T13:55:57Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-05cs
dc.description.abstractThere is a broad spectrum of different BM (Bankruptcy Models). However, complex bankruptcies are unique, vaguely known, interdisciplinary and multidimensional. These are the key reasons why sufficiently large sets of examples are not available It is therefore often prohibitively difficult to make forecasts using numerical quantifiers and traditional statistical methods. BMs development suffer from IS (Information Shortage). IS eliminates straightforward application of traditional statistical methods based on information rich environment; that is on the law of large numbers. Artificial Intelligence has developed different tools to minimise IS related problems. Trend reasoning is one of them. It is based on the least information intensive quantifiers There are four different trends i.e. qualitative values and their derivatives: plus/increasing; zero/constant; negative/decreasing; any value / any trend. The paper studies BMs represented by models based on EHE (Equationless Heuristics). An bankruptcy example of EHE is - If Selling of Assets is increasing then Satisfaction of Creditors is increasing. Such verbal knowledge items cannot be incorporated into a traditional numerical model. No quantitative quantifiers, e.g. numbers, are used in this paper. The solution of a trend model M(X) is a set S of scenarios where X is the set of n variables quantified by the trends. All possible transitions among the scenarios S are generated. An oriented transitional graph G has as nodes the set of scenarios S and as arcs the transitions T. An oriented G path describes any possible future and past time behaviour of the bankruptcy system under study. The G graph represents the complete list of forecasts based on trends. An eight -dimensional model serves as a case study. Difficult to measure variables are used, e.g. Level of Greed, Political Influence. There are 65 scenarios S and 706 transitions T among them. A priory knowledge of trend reasoning is not required.en
dc.formattextcs
dc.format.extent131-144cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfcs
dc.identifier.citationMontenegrin Journal of Economics. 2024, vol. 20, issue 2, p. 131-144.en
dc.identifier.doi10.14254/1800-5845/2024.20-2.11cs
dc.identifier.issn1800-6698cs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8507-5874cs
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5788-4044cs
dc.identifier.other188127cs
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11012/252549
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherECONOMIC LABORATORY TRANSITION RESEARCH PODGORICA-ELITcs
dc.relation.ispartofMontenegrin Journal of Economicscs
dc.relation.urihttps://mnje.com/sites/mnje.com/files/currentissue/Komplet%20MNJE%20Vol.%2020,%20No.%202.pdfcs
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalcs
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.rights.sherpahttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1800-6698/cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/cs
dc.subjectForecasten
dc.subjectInsolvencyen
dc.subjectTrenden
dc.subjectQualitativeen
dc.subjectBankruptcyen
dc.subjectTransitionen
dc.titleNon-numerical Bankruptcy Forecasting Based on Three Trends Values - Increasing, Constant, Decreasingen
dc.type.driverarticleen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
sync.item.dbidVAV-188127en
sync.item.dbtypeVAVen
sync.item.insts2025.06.16 15:55:57en
sync.item.modts2025.06.16 15:33:04en
thesis.grantorVysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta podnikatelská. Ústav ekonomikycs
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
131144Bockova.pdf
Size:
548.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
file 131144Bockova.pdf
Collections