Packing versus cavity: Zone-Specific contributions to mass transfer in rotating packed bed absorption process

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Blatkiewicz, Michal
Majdzik, Małgorzata
Lewandowski, Gniewomir
Piątkowski, Marcin
Jaskulski, Maciej
Hájek, Ondřej
Malý, Milan
Gorak, Andrzej

Advisor

Referee

Mark

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
Altmetrics

Abstract

A pilot-size rotating packed bed unit has been equipped with an infrared system for liquid phase analysis and a special interceptor that allows for online sampling of the absorbent solution at two points in the RPB: the outer periphery of the packing and the liquid outlet. Such a system allows to determine specific contributions of the packing zone and the cavity zone to the overall mass transfer. A standard chemical system of carbon dioxide and an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide was used to determine reactive absorption efficiency under different packing and outer casing diameters, as well as varying rotational speeds, gas and liquid flow rates, and inlet absorbate concentrations. CO2 removal up to 27 % was achieved. Depending on geometrical configurations and process conditions, the cavity zone contribution in total absorption efficiency varied between 0 % and 46 %. Outer casing diameter had deciding effect on the mass transfer in the cavity zone, but it was also significantly affected by the packing size and rotational speed.
A pilot-size rotating packed bed unit has been equipped with an infrared system for liquid phase analysis and a special interceptor that allows for online sampling of the absorbent solution at two points in the RPB: the outer periphery of the packing and the liquid outlet. Such a system allows to determine specific contributions of the packing zone and the cavity zone to the overall mass transfer. A standard chemical system of carbon dioxide and an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide was used to determine reactive absorption efficiency under different packing and outer casing diameters, as well as varying rotational speeds, gas and liquid flow rates, and inlet absorbate concentrations. CO2 removal up to 27 % was achieved. Depending on geometrical configurations and process conditions, the cavity zone contribution in total absorption efficiency varied between 0 % and 46 %. Outer casing diameter had deciding effect on the mass transfer in the cavity zone, but it was also significantly affected by the packing size and rotational speed.

Description

Citation

Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification. 2025, vol. 216, issue 1, p. 1-12.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S025527012500306X

Document type

Peer-reviewed

Document version

Published version

Date of access to the full text

Language of document

en

Study field

Comittee

Date of acceptance

Defence

Result of defence

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Citace PRO