VOLNÁ, T. Inovace řízení zakázek ve firmě [online]. Brno: Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta podnikatelská. 2021.
The student elaborated on a very current problem in the company Elmar group spol. s r.o. and made concrete proposals for solutions. The work is practically oriented and will serve to improve and speed up the order system in the company. I appreciate the independent approach to the elaboration of theses. Defence question: What is the biggest obstacle to starting the system you are proposing?
| Kritérium | Známka | Body | Slovní hodnocení |
|---|---|---|---|
| Splnění stanovených cílů | A | ||
| Zvolený postup řešení, adekvátnost použitých metod | A | ||
| Schopnost interpretovat dosažené výsledky a vyvozovat z nich závěry | B | ||
| Praktická využitelnost výsledků | A | ||
| Uspořádání práce, formální náležitosti, použitá terminologie a odborná jazyková úroveň | A | ||
| Práce s informačními zdroji, včetně citací | B |
The work is adequate for a Bachelor thesis. Taken into account, that the student provided a solution for a really existing issue, there is no doubt on the practical implication and conclusion. For further scientific work, the student should work on explaining the methodology (what was done, how, and why) and to build on solid and transparent analysis of the current state.
| Kritérium | Známka | Body | Slovní hodnocení |
|---|---|---|---|
| Splnění stanovených cílů | C | In the Bachelor thesis, the student proposes an additional module to a company ERP system in order to coordinate service orders, from planning to invoicing. It gives an overview on the benefits for the company, while mentioning the cost without going into any deeper explanations. The target is fulfilled on a good level. | |
| Zvolený postup řešení, adekvátnost použitých metod | D | The student misses the chance to explain the current status of the company's information system and its working in chapter 2.8. Being involved in the company and proposal process, the students seems to forget the reader's lack of insider knowledge when following the arguments of the students. Further, the student wants to use SLEPT and SWOT. However, these methods seem not to match the topic. | |
| Schopnost interpretovat dosažené výsledky a vyvozovat z nich závěry | C | The student misses to present the current state of the company and the information system in depth. Thus, the results are understandable, but miss support. The student understood the issue of the company and also proves the understanding of how to solve the situation. The student should try to focus more on readers without insider knowledge to transfer the methodology, the results, and the conclusion. | |
| Praktická využitelnost výsledků | A | The proposal focuses on a solution required in a really existing company in the Czech Republic. As such, the student is able to provide the contribution for a company struggeling with its ERP system and the service order management and realisation. | |
| Struktura práce, použitá terminologie a odborná jazyková úroveň | B | The language has flaws, showing that the writer is a non-native student. However, the language level is acceptable for Bachelor's level. The student should be aware that proverb are difficult to translate word by word. A proverb "more heads, knows more" does not exist like this in English language. Abbreviations, such as "PIS" should be explained. | |
| Práce s informačními zdroji | B | The references are correctly used. Structure-wise, I would advise to put the references in a logic order (e.g. according to the alphabet). Pictures are missing references. While the website is mentioned, the full reference is missing. |
eVSKP id 134459