The Comparison of 3D and 2D Measurement Techniques Used for the Analysis of Vehicle Deformation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Moravcová, Pavlína
Bucsuházy, Kateřina
Zůvala, Robert
Bilík, Martin
Bradáč, Albert

Advisor

Referee

Mark

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

SciTePress
Altmetrics

Abstract

As one of the main assumptions for the accident analysis has been detailed information about vehicle deformation. The precise deformation depth allows to quantify deformation energy and related impact speed. The aim of this paper has been the comparison of two selected methods used for the determination of deformation depth. For the purpose of this paper were selected top-view photography as basic and cheap method and 3D scanning as modern and advanced method. Different vehicles and 2 basic types of damage - frontal and side impact - were chosen for the analysis. Also, the different range of vehicle deformation depth were selected. On the basis of obtained results is possible to determine the applicability of these methods, their advantages and limitations.
As one of the main assumptions for the accident analysis has been detailed information about vehicle deformation. The precise deformation depth allows to quantify deformation energy and related impact speed. The aim of this paper has been the comparison of two selected methods used for the determination of deformation depth. For the purpose of this paper were selected top-view photography as basic and cheap method and 3D scanning as modern and advanced method. Different vehicles and 2 basic types of damage - frontal and side impact - were chosen for the analysis. Also, the different range of vehicle deformation depth were selected. On the basis of obtained results is possible to determine the applicability of these methods, their advantages and limitations.

Description

Citation

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems. 2020, p. 195-202.
https://www.scitepress.org/Link.aspx?doi=10.5220/0009353601950202

Document type

Peer-reviewed

Document version

Published version

Date of access to the full text

Language of document

en

Study field

Comittee

Date of acceptance

Defence

Result of defence

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Citace PRO