HAUKE, A. Mix/Match [online]. Brno: Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta architektury. 2024.
The project included the development of all architectural design stages to propose a creative and comprehensive architectural solution, which was technically considered. More experimentation could have been shown during the concept development stage, and the presentation of this. The final proposal provided a well-considered solution which was mainly driven by the site analysis.
| Kritérium | Známka | Body | Slovní hodnocení |
|---|---|---|---|
| Přístup studenta ke zpracování | B | Adriana is a dedicated student who was committed to her project this semester. The project process started well with an extensive site analysis which laid a good foundation for the next stages of the project – the site analysis was well-researched, experimental, and was backed up by various visits to the site in Prague. The next stage of the project where concepts were developed showed a slow start but progress picked up during the latter half of the semester enabling enough time to develop concepts into architectural proposals. |
The proposal approaches the problem sensitively. I miss elements of contemporary architecture that would elevate the project.
| Kritérium | Známka | Body | Slovní hodnocení |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urbanistické řešení | B | Urban approach is conventional. An interesting element is the corner opening of the block, giving access to the inner area. | |
| Provozní řešení | B | The layout of the building is functional. The choice of student and community housing is adequate to the neighborhood. | |
| Technicko konstrukční řešení | D | The design solution is schematic and not sufficiently described. | |
| Architektonické řešení | C | The architecture of the design is simple to ordinary. The only diversifying element, the rooftop tennis court, is not convincing enough. | |
| Formální úroveň | B | The project is at a good formal level. |
eVSKP id 159606